| Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 70.16 |
| Liaison | Kylee Singh |
| Submission Date | Sept. 19, 2019 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
California Polytechnic State University
IN-18: Pre-Submission Review
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.50 / 0.50 |
Kylee
Singh Sustainability Coordinator Energy Utilities and Sustainability |
The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:
Our report has been reviewed by the Humboldt State University, Office of Sustainability & Facilities Management staff listed below:
Katie Koscielak
Sustainability Analyst
kmk928@humboldt.edu
Morgan King
Climate Action Analyst
mpk9@humboldt.edu
ANDREA ALSTONE
Energy Planner / Analyst
ala25@humboldt.edu
TALLCHIEF A. COMET
Director, Sustainability, Energy & Grounds
tcc4@humboldt.edu
A brief description of the review process:
Katie was sent our STARS report in August 2019 and asked to review our STARS report to provide feedback on areas to improve and adjust. Katie and the HSU sustainability team used the STARS provided tools in order to complete this review. Katie and Kylee (lead Cal Poly Reporter) will be exchanging STARS reports and Kylee will review HSU's STARS report in early 2020.
Which of the following describes the review process?:
Affirmation from the reviewer that the submission has been reviewed in full and that any identified inconsistencies have been addressed:
Copy of the completed STARS Review Template:
Affirmation from an additional reviewer that the submission has been reviewed in full and that any identified inconsistencies have been addressed:
Copy of the completed STARS Review Template for the 2nd reviewer:
Affirmation from a 3rd reviewer that the submission has been reviewed in full and that any identified inconsistencies have been addressed:
Copy of the completed STARS Review Template for the 3rd reviewer:
Affirmation from a 4th reviewer that the submission has been reviewed in full and that any identified inconsistencies have been addressed:
Copy of the completed STARS Review Template for the 4th reviewer:
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.