| Overall Rating | Silver |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 58.37 |
| Liaison | Sohair Fahmy |
| Submission Date | Sept. 10, 2024 |
Cairo University
PA-13: Assessing Employee Satisfaction
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.60 / 1.00 |
Sohair
Fahmy Sustainability office coordinator Faculty of science |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Has the institution conducted a survey or other evaluation that allows for anonymous feedback to measure employee satisfaction and engagement during the previous three years?:
Yes
Percentage of employees assessed, directly or by representative sample:
60
A brief description of the institution’s methodology for evaluating employee satisfaction and engagement:
The Council of Ministers and the Center for Information and Decision Support, Measuring Mada, is the one that conducts questionnaires to measure the satisfaction of workers in some units of the state’s administrative apparatus with the work environment, including universities.
https://aru.edu.eg/files/pdf/satisfication-indicator.pdf
https://aru.edu.eg/files/pdf/satisfication-indicator.pdf
A brief description of the mechanism(s) by which the institution addresses issues raised by the evaluation:
1.The report has been distributed to the University Management Team.
2. Unit reports are distributed to each Unit Head to facilitate staff discussion and action on local issues.
3. The President launched a Work Positive Action Plan in collaboration with the Director of Human Resources.
4. Each unit is responsible for making local Work Positive enhancements.
5. The Work Positive Action Plan was advanced by the Work Positive Committee.
2. Unit reports are distributed to each Unit Head to facilitate staff discussion and action on local issues.
3. The President launched a Work Positive Action Plan in collaboration with the Director of Human Resources.
4. Each unit is responsible for making local Work Positive enhancements.
5. The Work Positive Action Plan was advanced by the Work Positive Committee.
Optional Fields
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.