Overall Rating Silver
Overall Score 53.49
Liaison Julia Angstmann
Submission Date Dec. 20, 2021

STARS v2.2

Butler University
PA-4: Reporting Assurance

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 1.00 / 1.00 Jamie Valentine
Assistant Director CUES
Biological Sciences
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Has the institution completed an assurance process that provides independent affirmation that the information in its current STARS report is reported in accordance with credit criteria?:
Yes

Did the assurance process include internal review, an external audit, or both?:
External audit

The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:
Amanda Keene Sustainability Operations Coordinator, Office of Sustainability Indiana University Perdue University Indiana CUES Advisory Committee Member Amanda Doenges Principal, Client Strategies Leader - Education Market HEAPY Engineering contractor with Butler and previous Campus Engineer at Butler Rebeca Dolan Affiliate – Center for Urban Ecology and Sustainability (CUES) Retired Director – Friesner Herbarium CUES Advisory Committee Member Stephanie Goodrid Lawson Executive Director McKinney Family Foundation CUES Advisory Committee Member Francesca Williamson Pediatrics, IU Medicine CUES Advisory Committee Member

A brief description of the institution’s assurance process:
Each individual reviewed aspects of Butler's report based on expertise. Individuals used the STARS review template and identified issues in a first review. Issues were then discussed with CUES Assistant Director, Jamie Valentine, who made needed changes. A second round of reviews was done on these identified questions to verify changes were sufficient. Each reviewer was sent an affirmation statement for them to sign.

Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASH​E:
Completed STARS Review Template:
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to ​submitting it to AASHE (2nd review):
---

Completed STARS Review Template (2nd review):
---

Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to ​submitting it to AASHE​ (3rd review):
---

Copy of completed STARS Review Template (3rd review):
---

Website URL where information about the institution’s reporting assurance is available:
---

Additional documentation to support the submission:
---

Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
All reviewers affirmation letters have been combined into one document.

All reviewers affirmation letters have been combined into one document.

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.