| Overall Rating | Silver |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 52.37 |
| Liaison | Sergio Alza |
| Submission Date | April 5, 2024 |
Brock University
OP-16: Commute Modal Split
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
2.68 / 5.00 |
Sergio
Alza Project Manager Facilities Management |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment:
16,680
Full-time equivalent of employees:
2,316.76
Part 1. Student commute modal split
Yes
Total percentage of students that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary mode of transportation:
61
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about student commuting:
Prairie Research Associates Inc. (PRA) worked with the Canadian University Survey Consortium (CUSC-CCREU) to produce the 20221 CUSC-CCREU Survey of Graduating students. The survey was sent out to a sample size of 1000 random candidates, 299 of which fully completed the survey.
Part 2. Employee commute modal split
No
Total percentage of employees that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary mode of transportation:
---
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about employee commuting:
---
Optional Fields
| Percentage of students (0-100) | Percentage of employees (0-100) | |
| Single-occupancy vehicle | 39 | --- |
| Zero-emissions vehicle | --- | --- |
| Walk, cycle, or other non-motorized mode | 4 | --- |
| Vanpool or carpool | 7 | --- |
| Public transport or campus shuttle | 20 | --- |
| Motorcycle, motorized scooter/bike, or moped | --- | --- |
| Distance education / telecommute | 30 | --- |
Website URL where information about student or employee commuting is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
Refer to page 7, Table 9: Methods of Transportation (COMM1), of the 2021 Graduating Student Survey Brock University for further detail on modes of transportations.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.