| Overall Rating | Silver |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 60.39 |
| Liaison | Christina Olsen |
| Submission Date | March 30, 2021 |
British Columbia Institute of Technology
PA-4: Reporting Assurance
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Has the institution completed an assurance process that provides independent affirmation that the information in its current STARS report is reported in accordance with credit criteria?:
Did the assurance process include internal review, an external audit, or both?:
The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:
Agathe Chu, Senior Internal Auditor, BCIT
Dwayne Doornbosch, Director, Facilities, Langara College
Patricia Baker, Associate Director, Facilities, Langara College
Raymond Yeung, Manager, Facilities, Langara College
A brief description of the institution’s assurance process:
The STARS 2.2 Review Template was used to guide the assurance process. Two levels of review were done using the Review Template:
1. A first internal review was conducted by a senior internal auditor from Enterprise Risk and Internal Audit. The auditor was not involved in the STARS reporting process prior to the review.
2. The second review was an external audit conducted by three individuals affiliated with Langara College in Vancouver, British Columbia. The review gave their STARS team an opportunity to get better acquainted with the STARS reporting process and learn from the BCIT STARS team.
Any issues that were identified were recorded and brought to the attention of the STARS Liaison Christine Pinkham to be addressed. After identified issues were addressed, the changes made were recorded in the STARS Review Template.
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE:
Completed STARS Review Template:
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (2nd review):
Completed STARS Review Template (2nd review):
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (3rd review):
Copy of completed STARS Review Template (3rd review):
Website URL where information about the institution’s reporting assurance is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.