| Overall Rating | Gold |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 65.14 |
| Liaison | Bremen Leak |
| Submission Date | July 10, 2024 |
Brigham Young University
OP-11: Sustainable Procurement
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.00 / 3.00 |
Bremen
Leak Associate Director Sustainability & Continuity |
Part 1. Institution-wide sustainable procurement policies
A copy of the policies, guidelines or directives:
The policies, guidelines or directives:
Part 2. Life Cycle Cost Analysis
Which of the following best describes the institution’s use of LCCA?:
A brief description of the LCCA policy and/or practices:
In line with its mission to "care for the BYU legacy through timeless design, precision construction, impeccable maintenance, amazing service, and responsible stewardship," BYU Physical Facilities evaluates campus products and systems with careful attention to cost, employing life cycle cost analysis as a general practice. Among the values of BYU Physical Facilities are the "responsible use of sacred resources" (most of BYU's funding comes from The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, which allocates a portion of church tithes to provide for the education of its members), "innovation," and "accountability and results."
Within Physical Facilities, the Capital Needs and Utilities Analysis department provides stakeholders of the Church Education System (CES) with a framework and process for asset management and leadership to ensure that long-term investments in assets are appropriate, needed, and aligned with the vision for higher education in CES. Likewise, the Facilities Planning and Design department and the Planning and Construction department thoroughly researches all proposed campus buildings and their intended uses with a rigorous series of checks and balances before any project is approved. BYU's Energy Committee, which meets monthly, employs life cycle cost analysis on all energy efficiency projects.
Part 3. Product-specific sustainability criteria
To count, the criteria must address the specific sustainability challenges and impacts associated with products and/or services in each category, e.g. by requiring or giving preference to multi-criteria sustainability standards, certifications and labels appropriate to the category. Broader, institution-wide policies should be reported in Part 1, above.
Chemically intensive products and services
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for chemically intensive products and services:
Consumable office products
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for consumable office products:
Furniture and furnishings
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for furniture and furnishings:
Information Technology (IT) and equipment
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for Information Technology (IT) and equipment:
Food service providers
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for food service providers:
Garments and linens
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for garments and linens:
Professional service providers
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for professional service providers:
Transportation and fuels
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for transportation and fuels:
Optional Fields
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.