Overall Rating | Gold |
---|---|
Overall Score | 65.14 |
Liaison | Bremen Leak |
Submission Date | July 10, 2024 |
Brigham Young University
OP-5: Building Energy Efficiency
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
6.00 / 6.00 |
Bremen
Leak Associate Director Sustainability & Continuity |
Part 1. Site energy use per unit of floor area
Performance year energy consumption
kWh | MMBtu | |
Imported electricity | 12,435,630 Kilowatt-hours | 42,430.37 MMBtu |
Electricity from on-site, non-combustion facilities/devices (e.g., renewable energy systems) | 0 Kilowatt-hours | 0 MMBtu |
Stationary fuels and thermal energy, performance year (report MMBtu):
MMBtu | |
Stationary fuels used on-site to generate electricity and/or thermal energy | 349,607 MMBtu |
Imported steam, hot water, and/or chilled water | 0 MMBtu |
Total site energy consumption, performance year:
Performance year building space
Floor area of energy intensive space, performance year:
Floor area | |
Laboratory space | 897,369 Square feet |
Healthcare space | 13,865 Square feet |
Other energy intensive space | 697,372 Square feet |
EUI-adjusted floor area, performance year:
Performance year heating and cooling degree days
Degree days | |
Heating degree days | 5,332 Degree-Days (°F) |
Cooling degree days | 1,892 Degree-Days (°F) |
Total degree days, performance year:
Performance period
Start date | End date | |
Performance period | Jan. 1, 2022 | Dec. 31, 2022 |
Metric used in scoring for Part 1
Part 2. Reduction in source energy use per unit of floor area
Baseline year energy consumption
STARS 2.2 requires electricity data in kilowatt-hours (kWh). If a baseline has already been established in a previous version of STARS and the institution wishes to continue using it, the electricity data must be re-entered in kWh. To convert existing electricity figures from MMBtu to kWh, simply multiply by 293.07107 MMBtu/kWh.
kWh | MMBtu | |
Imported electricity | 138,861,558 Kilowatt-hours | 473,795.64 MMBtu |
Electricity from on-site, non-combustion facilities/devices (e.g., renewable energy systems) | 0 Kilowatt-hours | 0 MMBtu |
Stationary fuels and thermal energy, baseline year (report MMBtu):
MMBtu | |
Stationary fuels used on-site to generate electricity and/or thermal energy | 685,324 MMBtu |
Imported steam, hot water, and/or chilled water | 0 MMBtu |
Total site energy consumption, baseline year:
Baseline year building space
Baseline period
Start date | End date | |
Baseline period | Jan. 1, 2015 | Dec. 31, 2015 |
A brief description of when and why the energy consumption baseline was adopted:
From 2016 to 2019, BYU transitioned from a heating plant powered by coal to a cogeneration facility powered by natural gas. The baseline year, 2015, is the last full year of operation of the heating plant.
Source energy
Total energy consumption per unit of floor area:
Site energy | Source energy | |
Performance year | 0.03 MMBtu per square foot | 0.04 MMBtu per square foot |
Baseline year | 0.11 MMBtu per square foot | 0.21 MMBtu per square foot |
Metric used in scoring for Part 2
Optional Fields
A brief description of the institution's initiatives to shift individual attitudes and practices in regard to energy efficiency:
A brief description of energy use standards and controls employed by the institution:
Temperature setpoint standards have been created for all campus classrooms, offices, conference rooms, general work spaces, labs, lobbies, hallways, other public spaces, and critical spaces. Since 2021, BYU has scheduled heating and cooling controls in a dozen buildings. In partnership with Bernhard, it has also perfomed energy analysis (investment-grade energy audits with several years of monitor-based comissioning) and implemented turn-key energy improvement projects for six buildings occupying nearly 1.4 million square feet. Another three buildings occupying 0.5 million square feet are in progress or in planning.
A brief description of Light Emitting Diode (LED) lighting and other energy-efficient lighting strategies employed by the institution:
Buildings at BYU are designed to be energy-efficient. Indoors and out, nearly all inefficient lighting on campus have been upgraded to LEDs and T8 fluorescents. In many buildings, occupancy sensors turn off lighting fixtures automatically when they are no longer in use. Finally, larger windows that allow more natural light help reduce the demand for indoor lighting.
A brief description of passive solar heating, geothermal systems, and related strategies employed by the institution:
A brief description of co-generation employed by the institution:
BYU's co-generation plant uses a combustion process to produce electricity and captures the resulting heat. While the electricity is delivered to Provo Power, the heat is used to condition large portions of the BYU campus with no additional emissions. This heat is not captured in the total campus energy calculations as it is not always fully used due to electricity generation requirements and can be considered a by-product of the electricity generation process.
The Utah Municipal Power Agency, which provides Provo with power, counts on BYU's co-gen plant for its clean power-supply goals. Its 2022 Integrated Resource Plan reports, "In recent years, UMPA has added more renewable hydroelectric generation from the Olmsted project, the Sixmile hydro project and additional CRSP allocation, more solar energy from two projects – Clover Creek in Mona and the community solar project in Spanish Fork, and finally the energy from the BYU Cogeneration facility. These renewable efforts by UMPA are reducing on dependance on coal and reducing our carbon footprint. UMPA’s largest member, Provo City, has adopted a goal of achieving 60% renewable and clean power-supply by 2030.2 UMPA is committed to work towards this and other goals for the reduction of greenhouse gasses, cleaner air along the Wasatch front and sustainable efforts by the public."
A brief description of the institution's initiatives to replace energy-consuming appliances, equipment, and systems with high efficiency alternatives:
BYU is reducing its energy consumption through improved building envelope technology, which reduces air flow through traditional energy loss spots (between roofs and walls) by adding an additional specialized membrane over the building insulation. This helps keep conditioned air inside the building and keeps out the unconditioned outside air. It has been estimated that building heating ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems accounted for approximately 30% of total energy consumption in the United States.
BYU is also improving its building automation systems across campus. A re-commissioning process was piloted at the Office of Information Technology Building and deployed on a larger scale at the Life Sciences Building. In two years, natural gas consumption fell by 50 percent and electrical cooling consumption by 30 percent. The lessons learned from this process are currently being replicated across campus. BYU has acquired infrared technology that allows technicians to produce photographs showing the details of building heat loss during the winter and cooling loss during the summer. This information is guiding efforts to make BYU's buildings as energy-efficient as possible.
Physical Facilities is working to significantly reduce energy consumption in 15 major campus buildings. Its crews have installed variable speed drives on all fans and pumps, replaced incandescent lights with fluorescent lights, replaced many office light switches with motion sensors, begun optimizing chiller sequencing to reduce energy consumption, upgraded roof insulation and retrofit many campus buildings with low-E reflective glass.
Website URL where information about the institution’s energy conservation and efficiency program is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
From 2016 to 2019, BYU transitioned its heating plant to a cogeneration facility that is contracted by the Utah Municipal Power Agency to generate electricity around the clock. This has reduced BYU's imported electricity.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.