| Overall Rating | Silver |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 48.87 |
| Liaison | Amy Parrish |
| Submission Date | July 16, 2021 |
Boise State University
PA-4: Reporting Assurance
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Kat
Davis Sustainability Coordinator Campus Sustainability |
Has the institution completed an assurance process that provides independent affirmation that the information in its current STARS report is reported in accordance with credit criteria?:
Did the assurance process include internal review, an external audit, or both?:
The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:
Reviewer 1 information:
Wendy Olmstead
External
Sustainability Coordinator, California State University Stanislaus
wolmstead@csustan.edu
Reviewer 2 information:
Dr. David Colnic
External
Faculty Fellow, California State University Stanislaus Council for Sustainable Futures
dcolnic@csustan.edu
A brief description of the institution’s assurance process:
Wendy Olmstead and Dr. David Colnic from California State University Stanislaus reviewed Boise State University's STARS report and provided the completed STARS Review Template with credits marked as requiring attention, as well as credits marked with suggestions for improvement. Boise State used this information to revise and update the STARS report data to address the issues identified by CSU, and updated the STARS Review Template with notes on changes made. Boise State sent the updated review template back to CSU for a final review, and CSU signed off on the final report review. Please find the attached documentation of the review letter as well as the complete STARS Review Template.
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE:
Completed STARS Review Template:
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (2nd review):
Completed STARS Review Template (2nd review):
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (3rd review):
Copy of completed STARS Review Template (3rd review):
Website URL where information about the institution’s reporting assurance is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.