| Overall Rating | Gold |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 69.22 |
| Liaison | Leslie Raucher |
| Submission Date | Dec. 11, 2023 |
Barnard College
IN-50: Innovation D
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.50 / 0.50 |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Name or title of the innovative policy, practice, program, or outcome:
Scope 3 Calculator, Stakeholder Engagement & Decision Making Tool
A brief description of the innovative policy, practice, program, or outcome that outlines how credit criteria are met and any positive measurable outcomes associated with the innovation:
During the 2021-2022 academic year, in collaboration with Energy Strategies, we developed a comprehensive Scope 3 tool consisting of three main sections:
1. The Calculator:
This component serves as a complete screening-level inventory encompassing all relevant and mandatory categories as defined by the GHG Protocol. To ensure accurate representation of an academic year, we chose 2019 as our reference, the last "regular year" prior to the pandemic. Each ledger account was meticulously assigned to one of the 15 upstream and downstream categories and subcategories. We utilized the most appropriate emission factors, drawing from the 2016 EPA EEIO detailed commodity, summary commodity, and summary industry data, along with other select resources adjusted for inflation.
2. Stakeholder Engagement Criteria Ranking Worksheet:
Designed to prioritize scope 3 reduction actions through stakeholder engagement, this worksheet involved key departments and committees such as Budget and Finance, Purchasing, the Climate Action Committee, and Campus Operations. Here's how the tool operated:
-Stakeholders were provided with essential information about our work
and were briefed on our scope 3 findings up to that point.
-Stakeholders were then invited to weigh the importance (%) of each
focus criteria category. These categories encompassed:
-volume of GHG emissions
-our capacity to influence and drive changer
-risk exposure
-stakeholder focus
-peer actions
-anticipated co-benefits,
-GHG emissions per dollar spent.
-Barnard's scope 3 emissions were meticulously categorized into 32
components, each quantified in tCO2e and expressed as a percentage of
Barnard's total scope 3 emissions. Participants were then tasked with
ranking the seven focus areas for each of these 32 categories on a
scale of 1 to 4.
3. Scope 3 Emissions Focus Activity Ranking:
This section provides a visual representation of focus activities, ranked from highest to lowest as determined by the criteria worksheet. Additionally, it tracks the cumulative reduction necessary to address two-thirds of our total scope 3 emissions, aligning with the minimum guidance provided by the Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi).
1. The Calculator:
This component serves as a complete screening-level inventory encompassing all relevant and mandatory categories as defined by the GHG Protocol. To ensure accurate representation of an academic year, we chose 2019 as our reference, the last "regular year" prior to the pandemic. Each ledger account was meticulously assigned to one of the 15 upstream and downstream categories and subcategories. We utilized the most appropriate emission factors, drawing from the 2016 EPA EEIO detailed commodity, summary commodity, and summary industry data, along with other select resources adjusted for inflation.
2. Stakeholder Engagement Criteria Ranking Worksheet:
Designed to prioritize scope 3 reduction actions through stakeholder engagement, this worksheet involved key departments and committees such as Budget and Finance, Purchasing, the Climate Action Committee, and Campus Operations. Here's how the tool operated:
-Stakeholders were provided with essential information about our work
and were briefed on our scope 3 findings up to that point.
-Stakeholders were then invited to weigh the importance (%) of each
focus criteria category. These categories encompassed:
-volume of GHG emissions
-our capacity to influence and drive changer
-risk exposure
-stakeholder focus
-peer actions
-anticipated co-benefits,
-GHG emissions per dollar spent.
-Barnard's scope 3 emissions were meticulously categorized into 32
components, each quantified in tCO2e and expressed as a percentage of
Barnard's total scope 3 emissions. Participants were then tasked with
ranking the seven focus areas for each of these 32 categories on a
scale of 1 to 4.
3. Scope 3 Emissions Focus Activity Ranking:
This section provides a visual representation of focus activities, ranked from highest to lowest as determined by the criteria worksheet. Additionally, it tracks the cumulative reduction necessary to address two-thirds of our total scope 3 emissions, aligning with the minimum guidance provided by the Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi).
Optional Fields
---
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.