| Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 67.35 |
| Liaison | Laurie Husted |
| Submission Date | June 9, 2017 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
Bard College
EN-10: Community Partnerships
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
3.00 / 3.00 |
Erin
Cannan-Campolong Assoc. Dir. CCE CCE |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
1st Partnership
Saw Kill Watershed Community (SKWC)
Does the institution provide financial or material support for the partnership? :
Yes
Which of the following best describes the partnership timeframe?:
Multi-year or ongoing
Which of the following best describes the partnership’s sustainability focus?:
The partnership simultaneously supports social equity and wellbeing, economic prosperity, and ecological health
Are underrepresented groups and/or vulnerable populations engaged as equal partners in strategic planning, decision-making, implementation and review? (Yes, No, or Not Sure):
Yes
A brief description of the institution’s formal community partnership to advance sustainability, including website URL (if available) and information to support each affirmative response above:
Material support including support through the use of facilities. Students, faculty, staff and community members work together to gather and process data garnered from sampling done on the Saw Kill and in the Saw Kill watershed. This allows community members to have a more direct interaction with the Bard community, as well as their environment. Students assist the community volunteers in training and in sampling. The data may be used to draw conclusions that directly impact the lives of everyone in the watershed community, which includes Bard College. If the Saw Kill Watershed Community did not exist, the members of the community would lose this opportunity to have the same direct understanding with the data behind a change.
2nd Partnership
---
Does the institution provide financial or material support for the partnership? (2nd partnership):
---
Which of the following best describes the partnership timeframe? (2nd partnership):
---
Which of the following best describes the partnership’s sustainability focus? (2nd partnership):
---
Are underrepresented groups and/or vulnerable populations engaged as equal partners in strategic planning, decision-making, implementation and review? (2nd partnership) (Yes, No, or Not Sure):
---
A brief description of the institution’s formal community partnership to advance sustainability, including website URL (if available) and information to support each affirmative response above (2nd partnership):
---
3rd Partnership
---
Does the institution provide financial or material support for the partnership? (3rd partnership):
---
Which of the following best describes the partnership timeframe? (3rd partnership):
---
Which of the following best describes the partnership’s sustainability focus? (3rd partnership):
---
Are underrepresented groups and/or vulnerable populations engaged as equal partners in strategic planning, decision-making, implementation and review? (3rd partnership) (Yes, No, or Unknown):
---
A brief description of the institution’s formal community partnership to advance sustainability, including website URL (if available) and information to support each affirmative response above (3rd partnership):
---
Optional Fields
---
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.