Overall Rating | Silver |
---|---|
Overall Score | 58.58 |
Liaison | Margaret Lo |
Submission Date | July 14, 2022 |
Ball State University
OP-5: Building Energy Efficiency
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
4.57 / 6.00 |
James
Lowe Associate Vice President for Facilities Planning and Management Facilities Planning & Managment |
Part 1. Site energy use per unit of floor area
Performance year energy consumption
kWh | MMBtu | |
Imported electricity | 123,843,471 Kilowatt-hours | 422,553.92 MMBtu |
Electricity from on-site, non-combustion facilities/devices (e.g., renewable energy systems) | 214,000 Kilowatt-hours | 730.17 MMBtu |
Stationary fuels and thermal energy, performance year (report MMBtu):
MMBtu | |
Stationary fuels used on-site to generate electricity and/or thermal energy | 13,211.18 MMBtu |
Imported steam, hot water, and/or chilled water | 0 MMBtu |
Total site energy consumption, performance year:
Performance year building space
Floor area of energy intensive space, performance year:
Floor area | |
Laboratory space | 495,309 Square feet |
Healthcare space | 33,171 Square feet |
Other energy intensive space | 194,052 Square feet |
EUI-adjusted floor area, performance year:
Performance year heating and cooling degree days
Degree days | |
Heating degree days | 5,100.50 Degree-Days (°F) |
Cooling degree days | 1,274.60 Degree-Days (°F) |
Total degree days, performance year:
Performance period
Start date | End date | |
Performance period | Jan. 1, 2021 | Dec. 31, 2021 |
Metric used in scoring for Part 1
Part 2. Reduction in source energy use per unit of floor area
Baseline year energy consumption
STARS 2.2 requires electricity data in kilowatt-hours (kWh). If a baseline has already been established in a previous version of STARS and the institution wishes to continue using it, the electricity data must be re-entered in kWh. To convert existing electricity figures from MMBtu to kWh, simply multiply by 293.07107 MMBtu/kWh.
kWh | MMBtu | |
Imported electricity | 138,958,794 Kilowatt-hours | 474,127.41 MMBtu |
Electricity from on-site, non-combustion facilities/devices (e.g., renewable energy systems) | 0 Kilowatt-hours | 0 MMBtu |
Stationary fuels and thermal energy, baseline year (report MMBtu):
MMBtu | |
Stationary fuels used on-site to generate electricity and/or thermal energy | 343,842 MMBtu |
Imported steam, hot water, and/or chilled water | 0 MMBtu |
Total site energy consumption, baseline year:
Baseline year building space
Baseline period
Start date | End date | |
Baseline period | Jan. 1, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2018 |
A brief description of when and why the energy consumption baseline was adopted:
Source energy
Total energy consumption per unit of floor area:
Site energy | Source energy | |
Performance year | 0.06 MMBtu per square foot | 0.19 MMBtu per square foot |
Baseline year | 0.11 MMBtu per square foot | 0.26 MMBtu per square foot |
Metric used in scoring for Part 2
Optional Fields
A brief description of the institution's initiatives to shift individual attitudes and practices in regard to energy efficiency:
The winner is determined by how much the overall complex decreases their energy usage. The measurement is based on the electricity and energy consumption. Each
hall ‘s kilowatts are measured weekly with hopes of reducing their consumption by 10% of their starting baseline.
The university also created a Residents Sustainability Working Group to review all pillars of sustainability and a potential 2030 carbon neutral goal.
A brief description of energy use standards and controls employed by the institution:
A brief description of Light Emitting Diode (LED) lighting and other energy-efficient lighting strategies employed by the institution:
All recent renovations and new construction projects, nearly 1,000,000 sf has a a standard the design standard for LED lighting.
A brief description of passive solar heating, geothermal systems, and related strategies employed by the institution:
Related strategies include:
Weatherization of envelopes: The university routinely upgrades insulation levels in roof decks when replacing worn-out roof surfaces with new systems; specifically rock-ballasted built-up roofing is replaced with cool-roof EPDM continuous membranes and/or green roofs. In addition, window replacement with high performance glazing and thermal-brake framing has been adopted as an operational standard.
Behavioral change campaign/communications. The university has facilitated month-long energy conservation competitions within the nine residence hall complexes and among all academic buildings. These competitions occur in the fall and spring semesters and are promoted with campus-wide email exchange and web-based reporting of week-to-week performance.
Lighting retrofits. The university has aggressively switched-out T12, halogen, incandescent, and high pressure sodium lamps as part of its on-going maintenance and rehabilitation programs. In addition, for new construction and substantial facility renovation, specifications mandate the use of LED light fixtures, and occupy sensing lighting controls.
Boiler retrofit/central heating/cooling upgrades. This comprises the core activity by which the university is dialing-down its greenhouse gas emissions; having eliminated four coal-fired boilers, three centrifugal heat-pump-chillers, and five water-based cooling towers.
Building system retro-commissioning and upgrades including automation. The university routinely switches-out dated equipment; installing variable-speed pumps and fan motors, CO2 return-air sensors, sub-zoning of air-handling equipment where feasible, and use of digital sensors to control systems operation.
LEED Certification/LEED Buildings. In its the 2007-12 and 2012-17 Strategic Plans, the university had adopted LEED Silver as the standard for all new construction and renovations/upgrades. In some instances, the university has achieved LEED Gold ratings for some of its newer buildings.
Innovative Strategies. The university has engaged in long-range planning for the future use of alternative energy sources on campus and on outlying properties owned by Ball State; including building-integrated photovoltaics, stand-alone-armature photovoltaics and wind energy conversion. In addition the university has expanded the involvement of students in immersive learning opportunities on campus (e.g. LEED Lab) wherein students under the mentorship of faculty evaluate building energy performance and provide actionable reports.
A brief description of co-generation employed by the institution:
A brief description of the institution's initiatives to replace energy-consuming appliances, equipment, and systems with high efficiency alternatives:
Website URL where information about the institution’s energy conservation and efficiency program is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.