| Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 69.71 |
| Liaison | Alex Davis |
| Submission Date | Feb. 28, 2014 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
Arizona State University
OP-14: Office Paper Purchasing
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.61 / 1.00 |
Betty
Lombardo Manager University Sustainability Practices |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
None
Does the institution have an institution-wide stated preference to purchase office paper that has recycled content and/or is certified to meet multi-criteria sustainability standards for paper?:
Yes
None
A copy of the paper purchasing policy, directive or guidelines:
None
The paper purchasing policy, directive or guidelines:
---
None
A brief description of steps the institution has taken to ensure that the purchasing policy, directives, or guidelines are followed :
All paper is centrally procured by Arizona State University Stores and ordered by departments through the University's e-commerce system from SciQuest. Purchasing monitors alternative methods of buying paper to ensure compliance. After a contract negotiation, the paper supplier reduced the price of 100% PCW, FSC paper to the same price as 30% PCW, FSC paper. Further, testing with 100% paper showed that there were no adverse impacts, and this information was disseminated to departments in electronic newsletters.
None
Does the institution wish to pursue Part 2 of this credit (expenditures on office paper)?:
Yes
None
Expenditures on office paper with the following levels of post-consumer recycled, agricultural residue, and/or FSC certified content::
| Expenditure Per Level | |
| 10-29 percent | 0 US/Canadian $ |
| 30-49 percent | 370,057.60 US/Canadian $ |
| 50-69 percent | 0 US/Canadian $ |
| 70-89 percent (or FSC Mix label) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
| 90-100 percent (or FSC Recycled label) | 59,276.80 US/Canadian $ |
None
Total expenditures on office paper :
429,334.40
US/Canadian $
None
The website URL where information about the paper purchasing policy, directive, or guidelines is available:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.