|Submission Date||March 29, 2018|
OP-19: Waste Minimization and Diversion
|0.99 / 8.00||
Director, Physical Plant
Figures needed to determine total waste generated (and diverted):
|Performance Year||Baseline Year|
|Materials recycled||102 Tons||150 Tons|
|Materials composted||0 Tons||0 Tons|
|Materials donated or re-sold||0 Tons||0 Tons|
|Materials disposed through post-recycling residual conversion||0 Tons||0 Tons|
|Materials disposed in a solid waste landfill or incinerator||208 Tons||136.50 Tons|
|Total waste generated||310 Tons||286.50 Tons|
A brief description of the residual conversion facility, including affirmation that materials are sorted prior to conversion to recover recyclables and compostable materials:
Start and end dates of the performance year and baseline year (or three-year periods):
|Start Date||End Date|
|Performance Year||Jan. 1, 2017||Dec. 31, 2017|
|Baseline Year||Jan. 1, 2014||Dec. 31, 2016|
A brief description of when and why the waste generation baseline was adopted (e.g. in sustainability plans and policies or in the context of other reporting obligations):
The 3-year period from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2016 is used as the waste generation baseline for consistency across all sustainability reporting.
Figures needed to determine "Weighted Campus Users”:
|Performance Year||Baseline Year|
|Number of students resident on-site||76||209|
|Number of employees resident on-site||3||4.30|
|Number of other individuals resident on-site and/or staffed hospital beds||19||18.30|
|Total full-time equivalent student enrollment||133||240|
|Full-time equivalent of employees (staff + faculty)||131||167|
|Full-time equivalent of students enrolled exclusively in distance education||0||0|
|Weighted campus users||236.75||376.88|
Total waste generated per weighted campus user:
|Performance Year||Baseline Year|
|Total waste generated per weighted campus user||1.31 Tons||0.76 Tons|
Percentage reduction in total waste generated per weighted campus user from baseline:
Percentage of materials diverted from the landfill or incinerator by recycling, composting, donating or re-selling, performance year:
Percentage of materials diverted from the landfill or incinerator (including up to 10 percent attributable to post-recycling residual conversion):
In the waste figures reported above, has the institution recycled, composted, donated and/or re-sold the following materials?:
|Yes or No|
|Paper, plastics, glass, metals, and other recyclable containers||Yes|
|White goods (i.e. appliances)||No|
|Residence hall move-in/move-out waste||No|
|Other (please specify below)||Yes|
A brief description of other materials the institution has recycled, composted, donated and/or re-sold:
Antioch College has routinely resold or repurposed equipment, furniture and other materials but has not tracked weight and category of these items.
Materials intended for disposal but subsequently recovered and reused on campus, performance year (e.g. materials that are actively diverted from the landfill or incinerator and refurbished/repurposed) :
Does the institution use single stream recycling (a single container for commingled recyclables) to collect standard recyclables (i.e. paper, plastic, glass, metals) in common areas?:
Does the institution use dual stream (two separate containers for recyclables, e.g. one for paper and another for plastic, glass, and metals) to collect standard recyclables (i.e. paper, plastic, glass, metals) in common areas?:
Does the institution use multi-stream recycling (multiple containers that further separate different types of materials) to collect standard recyclables (i.e. paper, plastic, glass, metals) in common areas?:
Average contamination rate for the institution’s recycling program (percentage, 0-100):
A brief description of any recycling quality control mechanisms employed, e.g. efforts to minimize contamination and/or monitor the discard rates of the materials recovery facilities and mills to which materials are diverted:
The College's recycling program has signage and color-coded, point of use containers to minimize contamination.
A brief description of the institution's waste-related behavior change initiatives, e.g. initiatives to shift individual attitudes and practices such as signage and competitions:
A brief description of the institution's waste audits and other initiatives to assess its materials management efforts and identify areas for improvement:
A brief description of the institution's procurement policies designed to prevent waste (e.g. by minimizing packaging and purchasing in bulk):
A brief description of the institution's surplus department or formal office supplies exchange program that facilitates reuse of materials:
A brief description of the institution's platforms to encourage peer-to-peer exchange and reuse (e.g. of electronics, furnishings, books and other goods):
Antioch College has a Free Store on campus to promote recycling and resource sharing.
A brief description of the institution's limits on paper and ink consumption (e.g. restricting free printing and/or mandating doubled-sided printing in libraries and computer labs):
Antioch College utilizes PaperCut to limit paper and ink consumption. Effective July 2016, all students have an allowance of up to 300 black and white pages per term. Staff and faculty must utilize their ID card for printing; cards are linked to departmental budgets.
A brief description of the institution's initiatives to make materials (e.g. course catalogs, course schedules, and directories) available online by default rather than printing them:
A brief description of the institution's program to reduce residence hall move-in/move-out waste:
Students can use the Free Store to repurpose residence hall move-in/move-out waste.
A brief description of the institution's programs or initiatives to recover and reuse other materials intended for disposal:
Antioch College collects flourescent tubes and recycles glass from tubes by utilizing a flourescent tube recycling machine.
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
The Antioch Farm has a composting program. However, these figures were not reported in this section because historical data was not consistently recorded. The College is planning to more accurately track this information moving forward.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution and complete the Data Inquiry Form.