| Overall Rating | Gold |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 67.18 |
| Liaison | Weston Dripps |
| Submission Date | Aug. 19, 2024 |
Amherst College
OP-9: Sustainable Procurement System
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.00 / 7.00 |
Weston
Dripps Director of Sustainability Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Does the institution have a published code of conduct to guide suppliers on the institution’s social and environmental expectations for them?:
No
Copy of the institution’s supplier code of conduct:
---
Online location of the institution’s supplier code of conduct:
---
Does the institution’s supplier code of conduct include one or more expectations in regard to environmental impact that exceed or are additional to regulatory compliance?:
---
Does the institution’s supplier code of conduct include one or more expectations in regard to the treatment of workers that exceed or are additional to regulatory compliance?:
---
Does the institution’s supplier code of conduct include one or more expectations in regard to governance and ethical business practices that exceed or are additional to regulatory compliance?:
---
Does the institution’s supplier code of conduct include one or more expectations in regard to the advancement of sustainability in the supply chain?:
---
Does the institution’s supplier code of conduct include one or more expectations of monitoring and review?:
---
Points earned for indicator OP 9.1:
0
Does the institution have sufficient data on its bid solicitations to pursue this indicator?:
No
Percentage of bid solicitations that identify product sustainability specifications:
---
Percentage of bid solicitations that identify supplier sustainability considerations:
---
Description of the methodology used to assess the institution’s bid solicitations:
---
Online resource supporting the percentage of bid solicitations reported:
---
Document supporting the percentage of bid solicitations reported:
---
Points earned for indicator OP 9.2:
0
Average weight assigned to product sustainability specifications in the institution’s bid appraisal process:
0 percent
Average weight assigned to supplier sustainability considerations in the institution’s bid appraisal process:
0 percent
Narrative outlining how the average weights given to sustainability considerations were determined:
Although we informally consider sustainability as one of the many considerations for selecting a bid, we currently don't have a formal process to include sustainability in the consideration for bid appraisel.
Points earned for indicator OP 9.3:
0
Does the institution have sufficient data on its contract spend to pursue this indicator?:
No
Performance year for contract spend:
---
Local currency code:
---
Total annual contract spend:
---
Annual contract spend with social impact suppliers:
---
Narrative and/or website URL providing an a overview of the institution’s contracts with social impact suppliers:
---
Description of the methodology used to assess the institution’s contract spend with social impact suppliers:
---
Percentage of contract spend with social impact suppliers:
---
Points earned for indicator 9.4:
0
Notes about the information provided for this credit:
---
Additional documentation for this credit:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.