| Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 69.79 |
| Liaison | Megan Litke |
| Submission Date | March 6, 2020 |
American University
OP-16: Commute Modal Split
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
3.88 / 5.00 |
Courtney
Stoner Sustainability Analyst Office of Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment:
13,452
Full-time equivalent of employees:
2,910
Part 1. Student commute modal split
Yes
Total percentage of students that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary mode of transportation:
82.52
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about student commuting:
The survey was distributed to a significant sample of faculty, staff, and students via email from 9/23/19 to 9/27/19 and received 755 responses.
The Office of Institutional Research and Assessment (OIRA) provided a representative sample of the campus population of faculty, students, and staff. OIRA checks the samples against the population on all of the characteristics included to ensure they are exceedingly close in terms of representativeness.
The assessment was administered by the Office of Sustainability using Qualtrics. An email was sent to the representative sample, and a follow up reminder email was sent several days later to those who hadn't yet completed the survey.
We excluded any students studying abroad or students that live on campus, as the students who live on campus do not commute to campus.
The Office of Institutional Research and Assessment (OIRA) provided a representative sample of the campus population of faculty, students, and staff. OIRA checks the samples against the population on all of the characteristics included to ensure they are exceedingly close in terms of representativeness.
The assessment was administered by the Office of Sustainability using Qualtrics. An email was sent to the representative sample, and a follow up reminder email was sent several days later to those who hadn't yet completed the survey.
We excluded any students studying abroad or students that live on campus, as the students who live on campus do not commute to campus.
Part 2. Employee commute modal split
Yes
Total percentage of employees that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary mode of transportation:
54.58
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about employee commuting:
The survey was distributed to a sample of faculty, staff, and students via email from 9/23/19 to 9/27/19 and received 755 responses. The sample was determined by the Institutional Research and Assessment Office.
Optional Fields
| Percentage of students (0-100) | Percentage of employees (0-100) | |
| Single-occupancy vehicle | 14.17 | 43.93 |
| Zero-emissions vehicle | 0.27 | 2.29 |
| Walk, cycle, or other non-motorized mode | 28.42 | 16.91 |
| Vanpool or carpool | 2.39 | 4.42 |
| Public transport or campus shuttle | 50 | 29.91 |
| Motorcycle, motorized scooter/bike, or moped | 0.69 | 0.16 |
| Distance education / telecommute | 0 | 0 |
Website URL where information about student or employee commuting is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
Ride-sharing was listed as an option in the surveys, however the alone rideshare ("Uber/Lyft/Ridesharing App") was not counted as a "more sustainable" option. This option made up 2.49% of the total trips (employee and student) taken to and from campus in the week surveyed.
Bikeshare and Scooter-share were in the same portion of the survey, so trips taken by bikeshare or scooter share (motorized or not) were included in the "Walk, cycle, or other non-motorized mode."
Telecommuting and distance education data was not counted.
Bikeshare and Scooter-share were in the same portion of the survey, so trips taken by bikeshare or scooter share (motorized or not) were included in the "Walk, cycle, or other non-motorized mode."
Telecommuting and distance education data was not counted.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.